Law360, New York ( August 1, 2013, 1:19 PM EDT) -- Recently, the federal circuits resolved a long-standing misconception about the rule regarding admissibility of expert testimony as set forth by Daubert v. Merrel Dow Pharm. Inc. 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Daubert determined, "'General acceptance' is not a necessary precondition to the admissibility of scientific evidence under the Federal Rules of Evidence." The U.S. Supreme Court found that such a test would not allow for an expert to rely on evolving, novel scientific issues....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
A Law360 subscription includes features such as
- Daily newsletters
- Expert analysis
- Mobile app
- Advanced search
- Judge information
- Real-time alerts
- 450K+ searchable archived articles
And more!
Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.