Jury Should Decide $162M Wells Fargo Tax Spat, Court Says

Law360, New York (October 30, 2013, 6:23 PM EDT) -- A jury should decide whether Wells Fargo & Co. is entitled to a $164 million tax refund stemming from a purported sham transaction involving a billion-dollar loan from Barclays Bank PLC, a special master said Friday.

Special Master Charles Gustafson, a professor at Georgetown Law specializing in tax law and policy, denied Wells Fargo's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of whether or not the bank expected a substantial pretax profit from the transaction, leaving the bank to prove to a jury that the...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Wells Fargo & Company v. United States of America


Case Number

0:09-cv-02764

Court

Minnesota

Nature of Suit

Taxes

Judge

Patrick J. Schiltz

Date Filed

October 5, 2009

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.