Generic-Reglan Suits Doomed By Catch-22, 6th Circ. Says

Law360, Los Angeles (December 2, 2013, 6:13 PM EST) -- A Sixth Circuit panel on Monday refused to revive seven lawsuits alleging a generic version of digestion medication Reglan caused users to develop a serious neurological condition, ruling the plaintiffs were caught in a catch-22 preventing them from bringing claims against generic or brand-name manufacturers.

Writing for the panel U.S. Circuit Judge Ronald Lee Gilman, upheld a lower court's decision dismissing the cases on the grounds that the plaintiffs had taken metoclopramide, the generic name for Reglan, and brand-name manufacturers couldn’t be held liable under the...
To view the full article, register now.




Case Information

Case Title

Gloria Strayhorn, et al v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al

Case Number



Appellate - 6th Circuit

Nature of Suit

4365 P.I.: Product Liability

Date Filed

October 4, 2012

Law Firms


Government Agencies

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.