Toxic Tort Defendants Expand Their Arsenal

Law360, New York (December 13, 2013, 12:28 PM EST) -- In a precedential ruling on the admissibility of expert testimony that is particularly significant to defendants in toxic tort matters, a three-judge panel of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Snizavich v. Rohm and Haas Co., No. 1383 EDA 2012, (Pa. Super. Ct. Dec. 6, 2013), ruled on Dec. 6, 2013, that an expert’s opinion regarding the cause of a plaintiff’s injury is inadmissible under Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 702 and the Frye standard if it is not based on documented scientific authority, such as facts,...
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.