The Significance Of Patent Invalidity As A Public Right

Law360, New York (February 12, 2014, 2:31 PM EST) -- ​In 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court asked whether a patent examiner, appointed per congressional authority, could reject claims in a reissue application for reasons relating to inadequate patentable novelty. McCormick Harvesting Mach. Co. v. Aultman, 169 U.S. 606. Given, as explained by the Supreme Court, that "[t]he object of a patentee applying for a reissue is not to reopen the question of the validity of the original patent, but to rectify any error which may have been found to have arisen from his inadvertence or mistake," the reissue statute did not represent an unconstitutional allocation of Article III power. Id. at...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!