W.Va. Doesn't Understand The Scientific Method: Part 2

Law360, New York (February 13, 2014, 12:57 PM EST) -- Thinking about Harris v. CSX Transportation Inc. and trying to understand how a court could come to believe that an educated guess that has never been tested, or one that has been repeatedly tested and serially refuted, could nevertheless constitute scientific knowledge I thought I'd reread Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products: Advances in General Causation Testimony in Toxic Tort Litigation by Carl Cranor.

It was published earlier this year in a Wake Forest Law Review issue devoted to advancing the thinking that produced Milward and now...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.