ACA Doesn't Breach 5th Amendment, DC Circ. Rules

Law360, New York (March 7, 2014, 5:06 PM EST) -- The D.C. Circuit on Friday rejected the latest legal argument against the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, saying Fifth Amendment protections against seizing private property aren’t violated just because some consumers pay insurance premiums that effectively subsidize other policyholders.

In their decision, judges cited a century-old U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Brushaber v. Union Pacific, which said that taxes can only be struck down as illegitimate takings if they are so arbitrary as to obviously be tantamount to confiscating property.

The individual mandate,...
To view the full article, register now.




Case Information

Case Title

Assoc., Amer. Physicians, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al

Case Number



Appellate - DC Circuit

Nature of Suit

2890 Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

January 7, 2013


Government Agencies

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.