District Courts Grapple With High Court's Actavis Ruling
Law360, New York (March 24, 2014, 11:52 AM EDT) -- In Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis Inc., 570 U.S. __, 133 S. Ct. 2223 (June 17, 2013), the U.S. Supreme Court instructed lower courts to apply antitrust law's rule-of-reason test to so-called reverse payment cases. The court offered limited direction, preferring to "leave to the lower courts the structuring of the present rule of reason." The court has been criticized for failing to provide more complete guidance. Eight months later, three district courts have looked to Actavis for guidance — and even before reaching the analytical framework, they have reached conflicting interpretations of the definition of "reverse payment."...
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.