$13M Bracewell Malpractice Row Heads To Jury

Law360, Philadelphia (March 21, 2014, 5:51 PM EDT) -- A Pennsylvania federal judge on Thursday said that it was up to the state's Supreme Court to decide the scope of arbitration clauses in contracts clients sign with law firms in his ruling that a $12.5 million malpractice suit launched against Bracewell & Giuliani LLP needed to go to a jury for a decision on its arbitrability. 

U.S. District Judge Joel Slomsky said that the wife of a man who slapped the firm with the lawsuit is entitled to a jury trial to determine whether she must...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

SANFORD et al v. BRACEWELL LLP


Case Number

2:13-cv-01205

Court

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit

Contract: Other

Judge

JOEL H. SLOMSKY

Date Filed

March 6, 2013

Law Firms

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.