Lawyers Weigh In On Supreme Court's Lexmark Ruling

Law360, New York (March 25, 2014, 8:33 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday clarified the standard for bringing false advertising claims under the Lanham Act, resolving a three-way split among the circuit courts. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the ruling in Lexmark International Inc. v. Static Control Components Inc. is important.

David M. Axelrad, Horvitz & Levy LLP

“The Supreme Court’s affirmation in Lexmark that ‘the proximate-cause requirement generally bars suits for alleged harm that is "too remote" from the defendant’s unlawful conduct,’ is an important reminder of a fundamental principle of tort...
To view the full article, register now.