5 Takeaways From NLRB V. Noel Canning

Law360, New York (June 26, 2014, 6:08 PM EDT) -- On June 26, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, which in key respects limited the scope of the president's recess appointment power.

The Supreme Court ruled that the January 2012 recess appointments of three members to the NLRB were unconstitutional, because those appointments were not made when the Senate was in a recess within the meaning of the Constitution. Rather, President Obama made those appointments when the Senate was in a short recess, which lasted only three days.

The Supreme Court rejected a broader, more restrictive rationale applied by the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!