Agrizap's Lesson On Secondary Considerations

Law360, New York (May 20, 2008, 12:00 AM EDT) -- In Agrizap Inc. v. Woodstream Corp., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held Agrizap’s patent claims invalid for obviousness.

Citing the Supreme Court’s watershed decision in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc., the Federal Circuit characterized Agrizap as “a textbook case of when the asserted claims involve a combination of familiar elements according to known methods that does no more than yield predictable results.”

According to the court, “[i]n this case, the objective evidence of nonobviousness simply cannot overcome such a strong prima facie...
To view the full article, register now.

Law360 UK

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Legal News & Analysis

Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.