Post-Nautilus Most Indefinite Patent Challenges Fail
Law360, New York (September 16, 2014, 10:56 AM EDT) -- On June 4, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Inc. and adopted the new “reasonable certainty” standard for finding patent claim terms indefinite. Some commentators suggested that this new standard would increase the frequency that claims are invalidated as indefinite. In practice though, that does not appear to have happened, at least not so far. In the three months since, almost 40 decisions have considered indefiniteness challenges and yet, generally, have rejected them. These results suggest both procedural and substantive strategies for practitioners to consider.
Overwhelming Majority of Terms are Still Definite
Over the 90 days...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!