By Daniel Wilson (October 29, 2014, 7:51 PM EDT) -- There was no legitimate economic or "moral hazard" reason to support the punitive loan terms given to American International Group Inc. as part of its 2008 bailout, a plaintiffs' expert said Wednesday as trial continued in a shareholder suit over the deal's allegedly onerous terms.
In both testimony and demonstrative exhibits, Dr. Michael Cragg argued that the terms offered to AIG for its bailout, cited by several government officials as intentionally punitive, were irrational from an economic standpoint and possibly counterproductive to stabilizing the financial system during the 2008 crisis.
"[In a financial panic, a central bank should be] trying to...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!