Post-Leegin Antitrust Law Definitions

Law360, New York (July 1, 2008, 12:00 AM EDT) -- Despite the Supreme Court’s decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc., [1] the Third Circuit recently reversed a district court’s entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of a truck manufacturer on a price-cutting dealer’s claim under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.

In Toledo Mack Sales & Service Inc. v. Mack Trucks Inc., [2] the dealer, Toledo Mack, alleged that Mack Trucks entered into a vertical agreement with other Mack dealers to facilitate the dealers’ horizontal agreement to maintain...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.