Law360, New York (January 28, 2015, 10:01 AM EST) -- In Commil USA LLC v. Cisco Systems, the Federal Circuit (2-1) held that "evidence of an accused inducer's good-faith belief of invalidity may negate the requisite intent for induced infringement."[1] The decision establishes a new defense to infringement actions under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), one "that had never previously been recognized by the Federal Circuit."[2] Indeed, the decision may "fundamentally change[] the operating landscape of inducement suits."[3] A petition for rehearing en banc was denied,[4] but on Dec. 5, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider the issue.[5] Accordingly, it is worthwhile to analyze the basis of the Commil decision and its origins in DSU Medical Corp. v. JMS Co. Ltd.,[6] to gain insight on how the Supreme Court may rule....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
