'Wellness' Check For Bankruptcy — Confusion Reigns

Law360, New York (January 30, 2015, 11:18 AM EST) -- If the Jan. 14 U.S. Supreme Court arguments on bankruptcy jurisdiction in Wellness International Network Ltd. v. Sharif, No. 13-935 (S.Ct.), are any indication, the upheaval created by the court's decision in Stern v. Marshall, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (2011), is unlikely to be resolved soon. What emerges from the transcript is, in a word, confusion.

In Stern, the court, in a 5-4 decision, limited the power of the non-Article III bankruptcy judges to decide certain matters that arise in bankruptcy proceedings. What was left unclear in Stern was the court's rationale. As Justice Antonin Scalia pointed out in...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Related Sections

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!