A Key Decision On Resale Price-Fixing, Post-Leegin

Law360, New York (July 17, 2008, 12:00 AM EDT) -- Under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits unreasonable restraints of trade, certain agreements are automatically deemed to be per se unlawful.[1]

The adverse consequences of violating the per se rule include liability for treble damages and attorneys' fees in civil suits. Some manufacturers and franchisors therefore breathed a sigh of relief when the Supreme Court overturned the per se rule against resale price maintenance (RPM), also known as "vertical" minimum price-fixing, in the case of Leegin Creative Prods., Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., __ U.S....
To view the full article, register now.

UK Financial Services

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Financial Services Coverage

Financial Services Law360 UK provides breaking news and analysis on the financial sector. Coverage includes UK and European Union policy, enforcement, and litigation involving banks, asset management firms, and other financial services organizations.