By Jeff Sistrunk (March 24, 2015, 6:51 PM EDT) -- The Eighth Circuit's recent ruling that the insurable interest requirement for a life insurance policy is met under Minnesota law when a person buys insurance on his own life curtails carriers' ability to challenge the validity of those policies, even those that are allegedly unlawful stranger-owned life insurance agreements, according to experts.
In a March 13 opinion, a panel of the appeals court reversed a district court's ruling that a $5 million life insurance policy issued by PHL Variable Insurance Co. was void from its inception for lack of an insurable interest. The lower court had voided the policy after finding...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!