Importing PeaceHealth To Tying: Collins V. Kodak

Law360, New York (April 7, 2015, 10:23 AM EDT) -- Last month, the Sixth Circuit in Collins Inkjet Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., No. 14-3306, (6th Cir. March 16, 2015) addressed the standard to show coercion in a Section 1 tying case when that coercion is allegedly accomplished via lower prices. Unlike any other appellate court, it applied the discount attribution test announced in the Ninth Circuit's Section 2 bundled-discount PeaceHealth decision.[1] That choice of standard was surprising, given the limited precedent choosing that standard for this question. Even more surprising, the court applied this usually defendant-friendly standard to uphold a preliminary injunction preventing the continued use of the tie....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!