Colo. High Court Axes 'Lone Pine' Orders In Fracking Fight

Law360, New York (April 23, 2015, 2:37 PM EDT) -- The Colorado Supreme Court on Monday held that state law doesn’t allow for so-called Lone Pine orders that require plaintiffs to provide evidence of an injury before discovery is completed, siding with a couple claiming that their children were sickened by fracking pollutants.

An en banc panel for the high court sided with an appellate court’s ruling, finding that a trial court violated Colorado’s Rules of Civil Procedure by dismissing William and Beth Strudley’s suit against Antero Resources Corp. after issuing a modified case management order requiring the couple to show evidence to support their allegations that their children suffered burning...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!