What Were They Smoking? Why The Graham Court Was Wrong

Law360, New York (May 14, 2015, 8:38 AM EDT) -- The Eleventh Circuit's recent decision in Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co[1] departed from conflict preemption case law. The court preempted negligence and strict liability claims of Florida plaintiffs relying on the class findings sustained in Engle v. Liggett Group Inc.[2] The panel concluded that the Engle class verdict did not distinguish the brands or bases for finding cigarette makers liable, making it essentially a ban on selling cigarettes, which conflicted with congressional decisions not to ban such sales. The ruling threatens dozens of existing verdicts and millions in awards....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!