We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

The Evolving Declaratory Judgment Standard

Law360 (September 3, 2008, 12:00 AM EDT) -- In January, 2007, the Supreme Court, in a footnote, reaffirmed an old standard for declaratory judgment jurisdiction. MedImmune Inc. v. Genentech Inc., 127 S.Ct. 764, 767, ftnt. 11, 2007 U.S. LEXIS 1003 (January 9, 2007). The Court criticized the “reasonable apprehension of suit” test and instead explained, “the question in each case is whether the facts alleged, under all the circumstances, show that there is a substantial controversy, between the parties having adverse legal interests, of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.