Fed. Circ. Is Adhering To KSR Obviousness Guideposts

Law360, New York (September 8, 2015, 5:43 PM EDT) -- It has now been more than eight years since the U.S. Supreme Court decision in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc., rejecting what it characterized as the Federal Circuit’s “rigid approach” to obviousness challenges to patents claiming combinations of known elements.[1] As part of the decision, KSR rejected the Federal Circuit’s limitation of the “problem” that could give rise to motivation to combine references in an obviousness analysis to the “problem” the inventor was trying to solve.[2] Instead KSR held that “any need or problem known in the field of endeavor at the time of invention” can provide a motivation for the...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!