We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

Is A Substantial Question Of Validity Enough?

Law360 (December 1, 2008, 12:00 AM EST) -- The recent decision in Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz Inc. (Fed. Cir. Oct. 21, 2008) highlights an ongoing debate within the Federal Circuit over the proper test for determining when an accused infringer has mounted a sufficient challenge to a patent’s validity to defeat a preliminary injunction motion.

The author of the majority opinion, Judge Newman, takes issue with the court’s practice of looking to whether the accused infringer has raised a “substantial question” regarding validity and asserts that this test conflicts with controlling precedent.

Instead, she...
To view the full article, register now.
Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.