A Dock Isn't A Building, Judge Rules In Insurance Case

Law360, New York (December 1, 2016, 7:32 PM EST) -- A federal magistrate judge in Washington state found Wednesday that a homeowner policy doesn't cover the full replacement cost of a dock damaged in a windstorm because it's not a "building" according to the dictionary definition.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen Strombom granted partial summary judgment to Property and Casualty Insurance Co. of Hartford and denied partial summary judgment to Douglas and Tammy Herzog, owners of waterfront property in Shelton, Washington. The Herzogs said they went to great lengths to buy a policy that would cover their...
To view the full article, register now.




Case Information

Case Title

Herzog et al v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford

Case Number



Washington Western

Nature of Suit



Karen L Strombom

Date Filed

February 3, 2016

Law Firms

Law360 UK

UK Financial Services

Read Our Latest UK Legal News & Analysis

Financial Services Law360 UK and Insurance Law360 UK provide breaking news and in-depth analysis on U.K. and European Union regulation, enforcement, legislation, and litigation involving banks, investment firms, insurers, and more.