A Dock Isn't A Building, Judge Rules In Insurance Case

Law360, New York (December 1, 2016, 7:32 PM EST) -- A federal magistrate judge in Washington state found Wednesday that a homeowner policy doesn't cover the full replacement cost of a dock damaged in a windstorm because it's not a "building" according to the dictionary definition.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen Strombom granted partial summary judgment to Property and Casualty Insurance Co. of Hartford and denied partial summary judgment to Douglas and Tammy Herzog, owners of waterfront property in Shelton, Washington. The Herzogs said they went to great lengths to buy a policy that would cover their...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Herzog et al v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford


Case Number

3:16-cv-05083

Court

Washington Western

Nature of Suit

Insurance

Judge

Karen L Strombom

Date Filed

February 3, 2016

Law Firms

Law360 Pro Say Podcast
Check out Law360's new podcast, Pro Say, which offers a weekly recap of both the biggest stories and hidden gems from the world of law.