Fed. Circ. May Be Setting Stage For Big Obviousness Changes

Law360, New York (March 20, 2017, 1:23 PM EDT) -- Thomas King

Pranay Pattani Although nonobviousness is a core principle of our patent system, consistent application of the nonobviousness principle has proven difficult. Even judges of the Federal Circuit have a difficult time reaching consensus on how obviousness law ought to be applied in a given case. These difficulties were recently displayed in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., an en banc decision reversing a panel decision. 839 F.3d 103, 1039 (Fed. Cir. 2016). The opinion is mostly notable because the Federal Circuit reversed the panel decision without permitting additional briefing, on the grounds relating to the substantial evidence standard....

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Beta
Ask a question!