10 Reasons To Use A Continuation Patent Application

By Rory Pheiffer (September 21, 2017, 1:44 PM EDT) -- With a notice of allowance in hand, you no longer have to consider whether it makes sense to argue against the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office examiner's latest rejection or amend the claims to expedite prosecution; instead, you have up to about four months[1] to decide whether to climb back into the ring for another round of prosecution by way of a continuation or divisional application.[2] Actually, "climbing into the ring" is hopefully not an apropos comparison for your experiences with the patenting process, as effective patent prosecution is more often a collaborative process with the examiner than combative. Regardless, once your patent has been allowed, the next strategic decision you have to make is whether there are good business and/or intellectual property reasons to pursue additional claims based on the disclosure contained within the patent application....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!