High Court To Weigh Role Of Jurisdiction In Wiretap Evidence

By Christopher Crosby (October 16, 2017, 2:55 PM EDT) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said it will hear a case over whether evidence gleaned from a valid wiretap that was used at trial to convict two men of distributing cocaine and marijuana should have been suppressed because the surveillance was partially conducted outside the court's jurisdiction.

The case, Dahda v. U.S.,  will examine whether evidence obtained under a wiretap order is inadmissible under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act because the order exceeded the court's territorial authority.

The petitioners, twin brothers Roosevelt and Los Dahda, are seeking new trials after receiving sentences in Kansas...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!