A Boston cab driver alleging Uber monopolized the market by helping its drivers circumvent local taxi rules asked a Massachusetts federal court Wednesday to preserve his antitrust claims, saying the ride-hailing giant is trying to hold his proposed class action to an “unrealistic and legally unsupportable higher pleading standard.”
Australia’s full Federal Court on Wednesday ordered Japanese auto parts company Yazaki Corp. to pay a record AU$46 million (roughly $34.5 million) fine for its role in an international price-fixing scheme, a nearly 500 percent increase over the fine previously ordered in the case.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will continue to negotiate with California in an effort to stave off a brewing legal war over greenhouse gas emissions regulations for vehicles, top agency air official Bill Wehrum told a House panel Wednesday.
VectoIQ Acquisition Corp., a blank-check company focused on acquiring a business in the automotive or smart mobility industry, saw shares begin trading Wednesday after raising $200 million through an initial public offering guided by Greenberg Traurig LLP.
Uber won plaudits Tuesday with its announcement that it would no longer steer sexual misconduct claims into arbitration, but critics were quick to pump the brakes on the praise, noting that the ride-hailing giant can still use arbitration to keep class actions from seeing their day in court.
Hundreds of lawyers claiming their work helped secure the $10 billion resolution of multidistrict litigation from consumers over Volkswagen AG's diesel emissions scandal told the Ninth Circuit on Monday that they deserve a cut of attorneys' fees and costs because their contributions were significant.
A New York federal judge on Monday partially granted a bid from Fiat Chrysler investors to depose more witnesses and add interrogatories in their suit alleging the automaker hid the existence of emissions control instruments dubbed defeat devices in vehicles in an effort to inflate share prices.
Toyota’s auto lending branch said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday that the U.S. Department of Justice and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau agreed the company has satisfied the requirements for early termination of a consent order reached in 2016 over allegations of unfair lending practices.
Seven environmental and consumer advocacy groups on Tuesday launched the latest in a string of challenges before the D.C. Circuit to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's decision to revisit Obama-era greenhouse gas vehicle emission standards.
Uber Technologies Inc. on Tuesday lost its bid to trim assault and false imprisonment claims filed by a 16-year-old girl who said the ride-hailing giant negligently hired a lascivious driver who held her in his car against her will, after a San Francisco judge called Uber's motion "a costly sideshow."
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Inspector General on Tuesday said the EPA has improved its vehicle emissions testing programs in the wake of the Volkswagen emissions cheating scandal, but should do more to increase compliance.
An Illinois federal judge has given a partial reprieve to CDK Global LLC and Reynolds & Reynolds Co. from consolidated multidistrict litigation alleging they monopolized access to car sales and service data in software licensed to auto dealerships, tossing part of a data integration company’s antitrust claims.
A trio of California Honda CR-V owners filed a proposed class action Monday in California federal court against the automaker, claiming their cars came equipped with defective collision avoidance systems that are actually making them less safe.
Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. said Tuesday that they will no longer push arbitration for individual claims of sexual assault or sexual harassment against riders, drivers or employees, clearing the way for such claims to be heard in court.
The federal government has told a D.C. district court that public interest groups have again failed to show that they properly brought suit against President Donald Trump's executive order that said for every new regulation, two have to be repealed, arguing that the groups can't demonstrate the order caused specific harm.
Volkswagen AG and its Audi AG brand have agreed in New Jersey federal court to reimburse a proposed class of drivers for the costs of repairing an alleged defect that puts certain vehicles at risk of losing engine power.
A Tennessee federal judge on Monday sentenced a businessman to three years in prison and ordered him to pay more than $10 million in restitution to victims of a multiyear scheme in which he obtained and misused more than $43 million in investments for his tractor supply company.
Attorneys for workers whose bankruptcy appeal led to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that narrowed the use of Chapter 11 structured settlement dismissals told a Delaware judge Monday the high court ruling nullified a deal that company lenders now want to reassert.
A California couple suing Fiat Chrysler over an alleged defect that causes its Pacificas to stall or shut off without warning said Friday the automaker knew of the glitch and had a duty to warn consumers before they purchased their vehicles, telling a federal judge FCA US LLC can’t duck their putative class action.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said Monday it would wade into a dispute over whether General Motors had the authority to change its policy on reimbursements for warranty work completed by the company's dealerships.
The impact of millennials has already been felt within the legal community by our eagerness to embrace new technologies. One way that we will have potentially even more impact lies in our willingness to embrace new ways of developing business and financing law, says Michael Perich of Burford Capital LLC.
The FBI raid of the office of President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer set off a firestorm of controversy about the sanctity of the attorney-client privilege, epitomized by Trump's tweet that the "privilege is dead." But attorney-client privilege is never taken lightly — I have battle scars from the times I have sought crime-fraud exceptions, says Genie Harrison of the Genie Harrison Law Firm.
In this series, experts discuss the unique aspects of closing a law firm, and some common symptoms of dysfunctionality in a firm that can be repaired before it's too late.
I am often asked, “When there are one or more partner departures, what can a firm do to prevent this from escalating to a catastrophic level?” The short answer is “nothing.” Law firms need to adopt culture-strengthening lifestyles to prevent defections from occurring in the first place, says Larry Richard of LawyerBrain LLC.
In a fully autonomous vehicle, a passenger's reaction to a traffic emergency is as irrelevant as her ethical calculations about potential injuries to herself and others. But if she agreed in advance to the safety protocols in the vehicle's programming, could she share liability in an accident? No one knows the answer yet, says Jim Jordan of Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr PC.
Last week, the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control added several Russian oligarchs, political officials and businesses under their control to its Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List. These sanctions will likely impose serious compliance challenges for both U.S. and non-U.S. persons doing business with Russia, say attorneys with Husch Blackwell LLP.
Given the competing public policies of protecting clients’ right to counsel of their choice, lawyer mobility, and the fiduciary duty partners owe to a dissolved firm, it behooves law firms to carefully review their partnership agreements to make sure they adequately spell out what happens in the unfortunate event that the law firm chooses to wind down, say Leslie Corwin and Rachel Sims of Blank Rome LLP.
For the vast majority of the 1952 Patent Act’s history, the requirement that an invention possess “utility” has been such a low bar as to effectively be nonexistent. Perhaps the tension highlighted in the Federal Circuit's Polaris v. Arctic Cat decision will prove the impetus needed to brush the dust off of the utility requirement in future cases, say Michael Rounds and Adam Yowell of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP.
The Delaware Chancery Court's recent decision in a Tesla stockholder case shows that even a shareholder with a “relatively low” ownership stake representing a “small block” may be found to be controlling under certain circumstances, say attorneys with Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP.
The New Jersey Supreme Court may soon decide whether to adopt the Daubert standard for admissibility of expert witness testimony. The searching inquiry into the reliability of proffered expert testimony that is required by Daubert protects the integrity of the jury system by ensuring that jurors are not misled by unreliable evidence, says Timothy Freeman of Tanenbaum Keale LLP.