Winston Rips Ex-Partner's Opposition To High Court Bid

By Mike LaSusa (August 13, 2019, 11:06 PM EDT) -- Winston & Strawn LLP on Tuesday tore into arguments made by a former partner who is fighting the firm's bid for the U.S. Supreme Court to review a California appeals court ruling that an arbitration agreement illegally limits the lawyer's statutory rights.

Winston & Strawn argued that intellectual property lawyer Constance Ramos, who sued the firm for gender discrimination, "barely defended" a California Supreme Court decision that is at the heart of the appeals court decision for which the firm is seeking the high court's review.

The BigLaw firm implied that Ramos, in a filing opposing Winston & Strawn's bid for certiorari,...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Attached Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Subscribers Only

Case Number

Subscribers Only


Subscribers Only

Nature of Suit

Subscribers Only


Subscribers Only

Date Filed

Subscribers Only

Law Firms


Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!