A California federal judge summarily refused Wednesday to accelerate a hearing considering access to classified materials sought by AT&T customers pursuing a putative class action over records collected by the National Security Agency.
A venture capitalist and his firm asked a California federal judge on Tuesday to boot them from a consolidated action accusing the Tezos blockchain network’s executives of offering Tezos tokens as unregistered securities, saying they had no hand in the alleged securities violations.
Office Depot on Wednesday urged a Ninth Circuit panel to revive its bid to force an AIG unit to cover its costs in a suit alleging it violated California's False Claims Act by overbilling public agencies, asserting claims under the CFCA are not necessarily subject to state law barring coverage for willful acts.
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. urged a California federal court on Tuesday not to sanction the company over its suit alleging Panasonic Corp. colluded with others to monopolize the flash memory card market, arguing Panasonic is glossing over the main part of the alleged scheme.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. owes benefits to a man and his wife for the amputation of the former's leg resulting from a car accident, the Ninth Circuit ruled Wednesday, finding that the fact that his diabetes may have contributed to him needing the procedure didn’t preclude coverage as the lower court said.
A former Franklin Templeton employee asked a California federal court on Tuesday to certify her proposed class of more than 5,000 members over allegations the company's 401(k) plan was mismanaged and full of poorly performing in-house mutual funds.
California-based women's apparel brand Lulus has scored a $120 million investment from venture capital and growth equity firm IVP and global investment manager Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, the company said Wednesday.
A California magistrate judge handed a quick win Tuesday to four environmental groups challenging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision to reverse course on a plan to protect the bi-state sage grouse under the Endangered Species Act.
The owners of a $250 million luxury yacht entangled in the 1Malaysia Development Bhd. embezzlement scandal must turn the vessel over to U.S. authorities, a California federal judge said Tuesday, finding the government was authorized to request the yacht’s relocation to U.S. waters as part of civil forfeiture proceedings.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will continue to negotiate with California in an effort to stave off a brewing legal war over greenhouse gas emissions regulations for vehicles, top agency air official Bill Wehrum told a House panel Wednesday.
The Federal Aviation Administration told the D.C. Circuit on Monday that it properly assessed environmental impacts before implementing new flight paths for Southern California airports as part of its air traffic control modernization program, insisting a challenge from local residents over aircraft noise must be rejected.
A squadron of Democratic attorneys general can swoop into a new, Republican-backed legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s constitutionality and fight the case, a Texas federal judge ruled Wednesday.
A Miami-based food vendor and its supplier escaped a proposed consumer class action in California federal court accusing them of misrepresenting their squid as octopus, when the judge ruled the latest complaint did not sufficiently meet a threshold requirement showing each class member's relation to the state.
Animal health company Zoetis Inc. on Wednesday said it will pay around $2 billion to take over veterinary diagnostics company Abaxis Inc., with Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz guiding the buyer.
Uber won plaudits Tuesday with its announcement that it would no longer steer sexual misconduct claims into arbitration, but critics were quick to pump the brakes on the praise, noting that the ride-hailing giant can still use arbitration to keep class actions from seeing their day in court.
Google objected Tuesday to an architect’s sixth attempt at alleging the tech giant stole his building design technology trade secrets, saying the amended suit filed in California federal court with bolstered Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claims was improperly filed without the court’s permission.
A group of beer drinkers urged the Ninth Circuit during Tuesday arguments to revive their antitrust suit seeking to unwind Anheuser-Busch InBev’s $108 billion merger with SABMiller, arguing that although the deal didn’t increase Anheuser-Busch’s market share, it harmed consumers by cutting the number of major brewers in America from three to two.
The state of California and several environmental organizations have urged the Ninth Circuit to overturn a lower court’s nixing of their challenge to the Trump administration's planned border wall in the state, saying the projects must first undergo environmental impact assessments.
Apple told an eight-member jury during opening statements in a high-profile California federal damages trial Tuesday that Samsung owes it more than $1 billion for infringing three of Apple's design patents covering iPhones, while Samsung pegged the number at just $28 million.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP announced Tuesday it has added 13 former Eversheds Sutherland attorneys to its state and local tax team, increasing to 19 the number of attorneys focused on state and local taxes.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland last year, district courts have received a large volume of motions to dismiss for improper venue. We analyzed 44 recent rulings on these motions, say Christina Ji-Hye Yang and Mareesa Frederick of Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner LLP.
The California Supreme Court's recent opinion in Heckart v. A-1 shows that an informal opinion from the California Department of Insurance may not be honored by the department itself, and there is no guarantee that California courts will defer to it either, say Shawn Hanson and Nicholas Gregory of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP.
What do you do when it seems that Washington is out to get you? If you are a lawmaker or governor in New York, California, New Jersey or any of several other blue states that relies on significant income or property taxes to pay your state’s bills, you get creative, says Gary Botwinick of Einhorn Harris Ascher Barbarito & Frost PC.
Under President Donald Trump, federal agencies have killed or delayed key regulations and imposed drastically fewer penalties against corporate wrongdoers — thus enabling cheaters, victimizing consumers and compromising well-behaving companies. It falls to state attorneys general, as well as the private bar — plaintiffs and defense attorneys together — to pick up the slack, says Daniel Karon of Karon LLC.
The Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Varjabedian v. Emulex Corp. substantially diminished the initial burden in pleading claims related to tender offers under Section 14(e) of the Exchange Act. This provides plaintiffs with a reason to bring their cases in the Ninth Circuit, say attorneys with Paul Hastings LLP.
Out of 94 district courts nationwide, the Eastern District of Virginia has the fastest civil trial docket in the country, now for at least the 10th straight year. The modern EDVA bench clearly takes pride in efficiently dispensing justice, and this dedication to efficiency has continued even in the face of increased filings, says Bob Tata of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP.
There are general rules for preparing witnesses for deposition. But what if the witness is a lawyer for a party in the case? In the Waymo v. Uber litigation, we — Uber’s counsel — had to make many tactical decisions when preparing four lawyers for deposition and trial, say Arturo González and Michelle Yang of Morrison & Foerster LLP.
With Mick Mulvaney gutting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the burden of standing up to giant, deep-pocketed financial institutions falls more heavily on state attorneys general. But in the end, such efforts can’t replace the power the CFPB has to protect consumers across all states equally, says District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine.
Personal jurisdiction defenses are waivable and should be pleaded at the outset of litigation. Still, suppose a defendant, not recognizing the impacts of the Bauman and Bristol-Myers Squibb rulings, did not previously plead a personal jurisdiction defense, but now wants to do so. It’s not a good situation to be in, but it’s not hopeless, says James Beck of Reed Smith LLP.
The Delaware Superior Court's decision in Arch Insurance Co. v. David Murdock underscores the importance of the choice of law analysis in insurance coverage disputes and reaffirms a distinction previously recognized, but not always applied, between D&O and general liability policies, say Jennifer Wasson and Carla Jones of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP.