Five state attorneys general urged a California federal judge at a hearing Tuesday to block the Trump administration’s proposed rules limiting access to birth control, arguing the rules violate the Affordable Care Act and will allow employers to unconstitutionally deny millions of women coverage for contraceptives by invoking religious beliefs.
A California jury awarded $4.6 million in punitive damages on Monday to the family of a man it found developed mesothelioma from asbestos, bringing to $22.17 million the total verdict against Imerys Talc America Inc. and Vanderbilt Minerals LLC, the latter of which has now settled, according to counsel.
VW, Audi and Bosch urged a California federal court Monday to throw out a proposed class action alleging they conspired to install illegal “defeat devices” in various gasoline-fueled vehicles, saying the drivers bringing the suit are attempting to piggyback off similar cases over diesel-fueled vehicles.
Banc of California Inc. urged a California federal judge on Monday to toss a shareholder suit alleging four of its directors used a scandal tying top executives to an admitted fraudster to wrest control of the bank, saying the shareholder failed to bring his complaints to the bank’s board before filing suit as required by law.
Attorneys from Morrison & Foerster LLP and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP will answer select written questions in Waymo’s lawsuit accusing Uber of stealing self-driving trade secrets after Uber objected to their depositions on the heels of a trial postponement over allegedly withheld evidence, according to an order filed in California federal court on Tuesday.
Admiral Insurance Co. need not defend a surrogacy agency in a negligence suit brought by former clients whose surrogate-born daughter developed a rare form of eye cancer, as the agency failed to disclose the claim on its policy application, according to a California appellate opinion filed Tuesday.
A California federal judge on Monday approved class certification for employees of Pier 1 Imports, simultaneously granting preliminary approval of a $3.5 million settlement that reimburses them for hours they spent working without pay while checking in to find out if they had to work a "flex shift."
A handful of retailers, including Walgreen Co., Rite Aid Corp., CVS Pharmacy Inc. and Kroger Co., told a California federal court Tuesday that they have settled claims against Japanese pharmaceutical company Teikoku and a domestic subsidiary in antitrust multidistrict litigation over the Lidoderm pain patch.
As California prepares for the legalization of recreational marijuana next year, state authorities are issuing emergency regulations and rules to usher in cannabis sales beginning Jan. 1.
Actor Charlie Sheen claims in a defamation suit filed in California state court that the National Enquirer Inc. fabricated a story about him raping now-deceased actor Corey Haim when Haim was only 13.
A California man asked a federal judge on Monday to certify a group of taxpayers in a suit against the IRS, alleging the agency lacks the authority to assess taxes on some late-filed tax returns.
The Ninth Circuit on Tuesday backed a lower court’s decision rejecting challenges from a Native American tribe and environmental groups mounted against a uranium mining project near the Grand Canyon, the same day the court upheld a ban on new mining claims in the area.
The head of the Ninth Circuit has a few options for answering allegations that Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski showed porn to female clerks and engaged in sexual banter about them, but ignoring the issue shouldn’t be one of them, federal court watchers said.
The Ninth Circuit on Monday refused to let a proposed class of AT&T wireless customers out of arbitration on their claims the company lied about its unlimited mobile data plan, finding that the Federal Arbitration Act doesn’t violate their constitutional right to have their case heard in court.
A California appeals court was “somewhat mystified” by a trial judge's exclusion of expert evidence in support of certifying a class of janitors in a wage and hour suit against ABM Industries Inc., ruling Monday that certification was wrongly denied.
Actavis asked California's high court late Monday to resurrect its effort to obtain coverage from Travelers for lawsuits alleging its misleading marketing of painkillers has fueled the nation's opioid addiction problem and caused a spike in heroin use, saying an appellate court's decision favoring the insurer bucked decades of precedent.
The Rosen Law Firm PA made a push Monday to lead Tesla shareholders in a California stock-drop suit alleging the electric car maker failed to disclose it was experiencing production delays on its Model 3 sedan, supposedly resulting in a nearly 4 percent drop in its stock price.
Winstead PC represented Rael Development Corp. in connection with its $55 million construction loan from Haynes and Boone LLP-counseled Hall Structured Finance for a Hyatt hotel and retail project in Palm Springs, California, according to an announcement on Tuesday from the companies.
A California judge on Tuesday shut down Disney’s attempt to trim a lawsuit accusing the studio of failing to pay the producer of “Turner & Hooch” a fair share of the film’s profits, finding that business violations and intentional interference claims aren’t moot despite a recently completed audit.
California and New Mexico on Monday urged a Wyoming federal judge to deny a bid by several other states and industry groups to undo the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s rule aimed at limiting the release of methane from drilling operations on federal and Native American lands.
Following the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in TDY Holdings v. U.S., government contractors and others whose property and equipment was used to support wartime production should be aware of several factors that could determine whether you obtain significant Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act contribution from the federal government, say Thomas Dimond and Kelsey Weyhing of Ice Miller LLP.
Having just completed a six-year term as chair of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, I read Yale Law School professor James Forman's new book, "Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America," with particular interest, says Judge Patti Saris, chief judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
Though the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act does not provide a private right of action, a recent spate of consumer class actions have attempted to use the law as a predicate for asserting violations of common law privacy-related torts and various state consumer protection statutes, say attorneys at DLA Piper LLP.
Recently there has been significant attention around new laws and ordinances that prohibit employers from asking job applicants about their salary history in various U.S. states and cities. But are employers outside of these jurisdictions free to ask for salary history information of applicants without risk? Hardly, say Joseph Kroeger and Audrey Roberts of Snell & Wilmer LLP.
The Ninth Circuit's recent anti-SLAPP ruling in Jordan-Benel v. Universal City Studios is the most significant decision of the past decade in the field of idea theft litigation in California, say Glen Kulik and Patricia Brum of Kulik Gottesman Siegel & Ware LLP.
On the heels of the new Insurance Data Security Model Law recently adopted by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, members of Mayer Brown explain the new law, its substantive requirements, and the takeaways for the insurance industry.
When defending claims involving Medicare, it is important to consider whether they may be preempted by state or local laws. An Illinois federal court's recent decision in Mayberry v. Walgreens highlights just how far Medicare preemption can reach, say attorneys with Ropes & Gray LLP.
During the holiday season, employees are more likely to request time off or call in sick. For retailers, however, this time of year typically means increased customer demand, staffing challenges and potential for more wage and hour exposure. Given these issues, attorneys at Greenberg Traurig LLP offer a few tips for retailers to keep in mind.
With the holidays and end of the year in mind, Robert Falk and Michael Steel of Morrison & Foerster LLP outline what food and beverage manufacturers and sellers should know before the temporary safe harbor warning for Bisphenol A exposures under California’s Proposition 65 expires at the end of next month.
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund. If the justices are sympathetic to the views of the Office of the Solicitor General, which filed an amicus brief earlier this year, it could signal an end to the epidemic of state court forum shopping in Securities Act class actions, says Skadden counsel William O'Brien.