California's high court recently agreed to decide whether a former pesticide manufacturer must deplete all its lower-level policies before it can tap into valuable excess policies to cover environmental damage claims, and attorneys say a contrary ruling, which would instead allow the company to target carriers in a single policy year, could speed policyholders' path to recovery.
A PayPal shareholder hit the company with a proposed investor class action Wednesday in California federal court accusing the company of hiding the potential for a data breach at a payment processor subsidiary that was disclosed last week and sparked a “precipitous” stock drop.
A Ninth Circuit panel peppered the U.S. Department of Justice with questions about the president’s statutory authority to restrict immigration during much-anticipated oral arguments Wednesday over a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration’s latest travel ban, which the U.S. Supreme Court recently allowed to take effect while the appeal proceeds.
A lawyer for the National Collegiate Athletic Association on Tuesday told a Ninth Circuit panel that it should disregard an assertion by the National Labor Relations Board's general counsel that scholarship football players are employees, after a recent memo reversed that stance.
A California federal judge on Tuesday decertified a group of about 500 San Jose firefighters who are pursuing claims that they were not properly paid for overtime hours they worked, saying the case would involve too much of an individualized assessment over whether each firefighter was actually underpaid.
A trio of California-based flight attendants asked a federal court Tuesday for preliminary approval of Cathay Airways Pacific Ltd.’s $1.9 million deal to resolve litigation alleging the Hong Kong airline violated various Golden State wage and hour laws.
The immigrant acquitted of murder by a San Francisco jury last week in the case of Kate Steinle, which has fueled a national debate over sanctuary cities, has been hit with new federal immigration and gun possession charges handed down by a grand jury on Tuesday.
Actor and former NFL linebacker Terry Crews on Tuesday accused Hollywood agent Adam Venit of sexual assault, saying in a California state court suit that the power broker acted like a “rabid dog” at a party and that his agency fosters an environment that keeps predators safe.
A federal judge wrongly denied attorneys’ fees to a California lawyer who helped shape an $8.5 settlement in multidistrict litigation against Groupon Inc. over short-dated online vouchers, the attorney told the Ninth Circuit on Tuesday, saying the court improperly lumped her in with other, less helpful objectors.
U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions urged the Ninth Circuit on Tuesday not to rehear a decision ending a constitutional challenge to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's use of national security letters that bar service providers from telling users about government requests for their data, saying it’s grounded in the U.S. Constitution.
A California judge on Tuesday held off on preliminarily approving The Talbots Inc.’s $2.95 million settlement that would resolve a proposed wage and hour class action brought by store workers, asking the parties to revise the deal so the workers have more time to respond to the settlement notice.
Fabric-maker Unicolors Inc. told a California federal jury on the opening day of a copyright trial Tuesday that H&M ripped off one of its patterns for a jacket and skirt, while the clothing retailer countered that it never even saw the design.
A 31-year-old man from Houston was arraigned and denied release Tuesday in California state court on allegations he masterminded a five-day phishing attack on the Los Angeles court system that attempted to steal online account login information from more than 500 court employees, charges that could mean up to 14 years in prison.
Summer Zervos, the former “Apprentice” contestant who sued President Donald Trump for defamation after he said her sexual misconduct claims were lies, sought to swat aside protests that his work was too important for him to be sued by telling a New York state judge on Tuesday that no one was above the law.
A putative class of Zappos.com customers urged the Ninth Circuit on Tuesday to revive privacy claims over a 2012 data breach that affected 24 million shoppers, saying the online shoe retailer broke its promise to provide a secure purchasing site.
A coalition of 15 attorneys general from states including New York, California and Massachusetts sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and its leader on Tuesday, alleging the agency has missed a deadline to identify the areas of the U.S. that are subject to smog reduction requirements.
Moldex-Metric urged the Ninth Circuit on Tuesday to again revive allegations rival McKeon infringed its trademark shade of green for industrial-use earplugs, saying a lower court wrongly found the color was unprotectable because it served an essential function — allowing workers to see whether colleagues are wearing them.
Perkins Coie LLP added a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission attorney to its San Francisco office as a partner with a focus on blockchain technology, the firm announced Monday.
Micron Technology Inc. accused two companies in Taiwan and China of recruiting its employees and stealing valuable information about Micron’s dynamic random access memory integrated circuits in an attempt to become viable rivals to the California company, according to a suit filed Tuesday.
A California state appeals court affirmed a Los Angeles County court decision Monday, confirming the constitutionality of the city of Norwalk’s 5.5 percent tax on various types of telephone services.
Today's climate of “alternative facts” has jurors making decisions based on beliefs, emotions and social affiliations that often go unacknowledged or underappreciated. To present their case in the most persuasive manner possible, litigators should consider adapting to their audience when it comes to four psychological factors, say consultants with Persuasion Strategies, a service of Holland & Hart LLP.
Following a California appellate court’s Nov. 6 opinion in Travelers v. Actavis and recent lawsuits disclaiming damages for bodily harm, the pharmaceutical industry faces new challenges in recovering insurance for opioid lawsuits filed by government plaintiffs, say R. Patrick Bedell and Kevin Harris of BatesCarey LLP.
Nothing has been more instrumental in my role as a legal recruiter than what I learned from a variety of hedge fund managers, venture capitalists and investment bankers — how to analyze a deal and make a decision quickly. It boils down to the traditional SWOT analysis, says Howard Cohl, director in Major Lindsey & Africa’s emerging markets group.
Last week, a D.C. federal judge halted much of President Donald Trump’s controversial ban on transgender military service, which he first announced via Twitter. The use of the president’s own (albeit, unofficial) statements against him marks an emerging theme in litigation challenging the president’s agenda, says Bryan Jacoutot of Taylor English.
California Gov. Jerry Brown recently signed the Cleaning Product Right to Know Act of 2017 into law. It will require online ingredient listing and on-package disclosure of ingredients by manufacturers of cleaning products. This new law is just one of the latest actions taken by a state to somehow regulate the use of chemicals, says Judah Prero of Sidley Austin LLP.
In Marsh v. J. Alexander’s, the Ninth Circuit recently found that it was not required to defer to the U.S. Department of Labor’s Field Operation Handbook interpretation of “dual jobs” because the interpretation is inconsistent with the regulation, acknowledging that its decision would create a split among the circuits, says Laura Lawless Robertson of Squire Patton Boggs LLP.
As law firms begin preparing for their annual budget review, Steve Falkin and Lee Garbowitz of HBR Consulting discuss why firm leaders should give their internal information technology and procurement teams a seat at the table.
The Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Los Angeles v. Aecom is the first appellate decision to hold that the Americans with Disabilities Act does not necessarily preempt contribution claims as between co-defendants, possibly signalling a retreat from wholesale rejection of indemnity and contribution claims in ADA cases, says Robert Naeve of Jones Day.
When the U.S. Supreme Court decided the now-famous TC Heartland case in May 2017, a robust discussion began regarding how significant its effects would be. Chase Perry of Ankura examined statistics from recent months in search of changes in case filing patterns and patent holder success metrics.
Recent gig economy cases in New York and California are either pending or were settled before the court could issue a determinative judgment as to the proper classification of workers. But the facts of the cases and the settlement details provide valuable insight into the potential risks and exposure for gig economy companies, say attorneys with Pepper Hamilton LLP.