Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. Whirlpool Corporation
Case Number:
1:08-cv-00242
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 21, 2011
LG Ordered To Pay Costs To Whirlpool In False Ad Suit
An Illinois federal judge has ordered LG Electronics USA Inc. to pay $411,000 in court costs to Whirlpool Corp. after it lost most of a case accusing Whirlpool of falsely advertising its dryers as "steam dryers," Whirlpool said Friday.
-
August 10, 2011
Judge Nixes LG False Marketing Verdict Against Whirlpool
An Illinois federal judge on Wednesday overruled a jury verdict that Whirlpool Corp. violated a state false advertising law in marketing its steam dryers, a decision that destroys any claim to victory for plaintiff LG Electronics USA Inc. in the unfair competition suit.
-
May 09, 2011
Judge Ends LG's False Ad Case Against Whirlpool
LG Electronics USA Inc. will get nothing from its three-year-long legal battle to stop rival Whirlpool Corp. from saying its dryers use steam, an Illinois federal judge said Monday, ending the false advertising case.
-
October 20, 2010
Jury Sides Largely With Whirlpool In Lanham Act Case
A federal jury largely found for Whirlpool Corp. on Wednesday in an $84.5 million false advertising case brought by rival LG Electronics USA Inc., saying Whirlpool did not infringe the Lanham Act and an Illinois consumer fraud statute in its advertising of clothes dryers.