Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
DISH Network LLC v. Fun Dish Inc.
Case Number:
1:08-cv-01540
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Benesch
- Calfee Halter
- Cavitch Familo
- Ciano & Goldwasser
- DLA Piper
- Edwards Wildman
- Eisner LLP
- Lathrop GPM
- McCarthy Lebit
- Meagher & Geer
- Reminger Co.
- Tressler LLP
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 12, 2017
Misconduct Gets DLA Piper Attys Tossed From Dish IP Row
DLA Piper attorneys were thrown out of Dish Network LLC's trademark suit against a DirecTV retailer Tuesday after they asked to file one too many amended complaints, as an Ohio federal judge ruled that the company's latest attempt to rework its case was "blatant" bad faith conduct.
-
March 17, 2014
Judge Hints At Additional Sanctions In Dish Trademark Row
The Ohio federal judge overseeing a long-running trademark tussle between Dish Network LLC and a DirecTV retailer approved the application of sanctions for attorneys on both sides of the bar Monday, but held off on ordering payment as the court mulls further allegations of misconduct.
-
September 21, 2012
Feuding Attys Sanctioned In Dish Trademark Dispute
An exasperated Ohio federal judge on Thursday sanctioned both sides in a long-running trademark battle between Dish Network LLC and a DirecTV retailer, saying he had never previously encountered "such divisiveness or contentiousness" in his 17 years on the bench.