Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Company et al
Case Number:
1:10-cv-01441
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 03, 2014
P&G Swiffer Marking Suit Nixed Over Retroactive AIA Limits
The America Invents Act's retroactive elimination of qui tam false marking lawsuits is constitutional, an Illinois federal judge ruled Thursday, dooming a suit accusing Procter & Gamble Co. of labeling its Swiffer replacement cloths and wet pads with inapplicable patents.
-
December 13, 2011
US Defends AIA's Limit On Marking Suits In Swiffer Row
The U.S. on Monday defended the constitutionality of a provision of the patent reform law that retroactively limits qui tam false marking suits, filing a brief in a suit targeting Procter & Gamble Co.'s Swiffer products in Illinois federal court.