Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Company et al
Case Number:
1:10-cv-01441
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 03, 2014
P&G Swiffer Marking Suit Nixed Over Retroactive AIA Limits
The America Invents Act's retroactive elimination of qui tam false marking lawsuits is constitutional, an Illinois federal judge ruled Thursday, dooming a suit accusing Procter & Gamble Co. of labeling its Swiffer replacement cloths and wet pads with inapplicable patents.
-
December 13, 2011
US Defends AIA's Limit On Marking Suits In Swiffer Row
The U.S. on Monday defended the constitutionality of a provision of the patent reform law that retroactively limits qui tam false marking suits, filing a brief in a suit targeting Procter & Gamble Co.'s Swiffer products in Illinois federal court.