Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
United States Of, et al v. District Council Of, et al
Case Number:
1:90-cv-05722
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Judge:
Firms
- Archer Byington
- Bond Schoeneck
- Bracewell LLP
- Cole Schotz
- Cozen O'Connor
- Crowell & Moring
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Fahringer & Dubno
- Fried Frank
- Holland & Knight
- Kauff McGuire
- Kramer Levin
- Latham & Watkins
- McElroy Deutsch
- Meyer Suozzi
- Mintz Levin
- Peckar & Abramson
- Renfroe Driscoll
- Schulte Roth
- Sive Paget
- Spivak Lipton
- Stulberg & Walsh
- Vladeck Raskin
- WilmerHale
- Ziskin Law Firm LLP
- Zuckerman Spaeder
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 19, 2018
Union Bosses Sat On Sex Harassment Charge: NY Carpenters
Two members of a carpenters union told a New York federal court Monday that the union's leadership didn't inform members about allegations that the union president had sexually harassed a female employee until after he won re-election in December.
-
September 12, 2016
Cell Data Subpoena Illegal, Ex-Shop Steward Tells 2nd Circ.
A former carpenters union delegate and shop steward who lost his union gig for collecting benefit contributions from his employer when cell phone data showed him away from the job site told a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Monday that the subpoena for his phone records was unlawful and that a district court order that allowed his ouster to stand should be reversed.