Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
November 01, 2010
Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Case Number:
3:10-cv-04945
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Berry Silberberg
- Boersch & Illovsky
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Covington & Burling
- Crowell & Moring
- Davis Polk
- Farmer Brownstein
- Freitas & Weinberg
- Gibson Dunn
- Hillis Clark
- K&L Gates
- Law Office of John D. Cline
- Munger Tolles
- Nossaman LLP
- Paul Hastings
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Sheppard Mullin
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- White & Case
- WilmerHale
Companies
- AU Optronics Corp.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- Kmart Corp.
- LG Display Co. Ltd.
- Newegg Inc.
- Panasonic Corp.
- RadioShack Corporation
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Sears Holdings Corp.
- Sharp Corp.
- Target Corp.
- Toshiba Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
November 19, 2012
Sanyo Loses Bid To Escape LCD Price-Fixing MDL
A California federal judge on Monday refused to toss federal antitrust claims from multidistrict litigation against Sanyo Consumer Electronics, ruling that enough evidence exists to prove Sanyo conspired with other electronics makers to fix liquid crystal display prices.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login