Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Rankings
- Data-Driven Lawyers
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Glass Ceiling Report
- Global 20
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Site Menu
- Join the Law360 team
- Search legal jobs
- Learn more about Law360
- Read testimonials
- Contact Law360
- Sign up for our newsletters
- Site Map
- Help
We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close
April 27, 2010
Doe et al v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:10-cv-00899
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 24, 2017
Swift Slams Drivers' Bid To Restart Class Suit Pending Appeal
Swift Transportation Co. slammed a group of drivers’ bid to restart their proposed class action alleging the company misclassified drivers as independent contractors, saying Thursday that the Ninth Circuit is still weighing its appeal of an Arizona ruling that its drivers’ contractor agreements were contracts of employment.
Parties
To view the parties, register now.
Try Law360 FREE for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login