Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Protostorm, LLC et al v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP et al
Case Number:
1:08-cv-00931
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Davidoff Hutcher
- Foley & Lardner
- Furman Kornfeld
- Gallet Dreyer
- L'Abbate Balkan
- Lever & Ecker
- Lewis Brisbois
- Miranda Slone
- Mound Cotton
- Ropers Majeski
- Simon & Partners
- Stone & Magnanini
- Traub Lieberman
- Wiley Rein
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 26, 2015
Antonelli Can't Limit Execution Of $8M Malpractice Judgment
A New York federal judge on Monday denied a request from Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP to restrict an ex-client from executing the $8 million judgment it won in a malpractice case against the firm over an allegedly botched patent application, calling the firm's move "entirely misplaced" and warning the parties off their "fusillade" of filings.
-
October 05, 2015
Antonelli Terry Ordered To Pay $224K In Contempt Sanctions
A New York federal judge has ordered Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP and a former managing partner to pay nearly $225,000 in sanctions for violating a December court order meant to limit how the firm allocates its funds as it appeals a nearly $8 million judgment in a malpractice case brought by Protostorm LLC.
-
August 03, 2015
Antonelli In Hot Water As Protostorm Pushes For Contempt
An incredulous New York federal judge asked Monday how Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP could have ceased legal work without telling her it was winding down as plaintiff Protostorm LLC sought a contempt ruling in its quest to collect an $8.6 million malpractice award against the fallen firm over botched online ad patents.
-
June 29, 2015
Antonelli To Appeal $8M Malpractice Award In Ad Patent Row
Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP lodged an appeal with the Second Circuit on Monday less than a month after a New York federal judge refused to kill an $8 million malpractice award against the law firm in a suit brought by Protostorm LLC over botched online ad patents.
-
June 08, 2015
Alice Doesn't Nix $8M Antonelli Malpractice Award, Judge Says
A New York federal judge on Friday refused to kill an $8 million malpractice award against law firm Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP in Protostorm LLC's suit over botched online ad patents, saying the firm didn't pursue its defense under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling until after the trial.
-
February 25, 2015
Former Antonelli Attys Fight $8M IP Malpractice Verdict
Two former attorneys for Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP on Wednesday joined the firm's bid to kill an $8 million malpractice award against them in a suit filed by Protostrom LLC over botched online ad patents, saying that they can't be held personally liable for the firm's actions.
-
January 13, 2015
Antonelli Says Alice Kills Protostorm's $8M Malpractice Win
Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP on Tuesday told a New York federal judge that the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling on patentability of abstract ideas kills an $8 million malpractice award against the firm in a suit brought by Protostorm LLC over botched online ad patents.
-
December 11, 2014
Judge Won't Double $7M Antonelli Terry Malpractice Award
A New York federal judge on Thursday rejected Protostorm LLC's bid to nearly double the $6.7 million compensatory damages award it won in its malpractice suit against Antonelli Terry Stout & Krauss LLP over a botched patent application, saying prejudgment interest applies only to prejudgment losses.
-
November 06, 2014
Antonelli Terry Rips Bid To Double $8M Malpractice Verdict
Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP struck back Wednesday at a request by technology company Protostorm LLC to nearly double an $8 million jury verdict to $15 million, saying prejudgment interest shouldn't be allowed in the malpractice suit over a botched patent application.
-
October 30, 2014
Antonelli Hit With Spending Limits After Patent Filing Blunder
A New York federal judge on Wednesday hit Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP with temporary spending restrictions and accountability measures following a nearly $8 million judgment levied against the law firm in Protostorm LLC's malpractice suit accusing the firm of botching a patent application.