Magnetar Technologies Corp, et al v. Six Flags Theme Park Inc. et al

  1. March 13, 2017

    Judge Advises $1.1M In Fees For Six Flags In Patent Case

    A federal magistrate judge recommended Monday that Six Flags Theme Parks Inc. receive more than $1.1 million in attorneys' fees from two companies that unsuccessfully accused it of patent infringement, finding the firms had behaved unreasonably.

  2. August 17, 2015

    Six Flags Patent Challengers Fight Atty Fee Bid In Del.

    Companies that filed unsuccessful patent suits against Six Flags Theme Park Inc. and other amusement parks urged a Delaware federal court on Friday to ignore a judge's recommendation that the theme parks be awarded some of a $1.76 million attorneys' fees request, arguing the case was not "exceptional."

  3. July 21, 2015

    Six Flags Can't Recoup Full $1.76M Costs In 'Exceptional' Suit

    A federal judge recommended Tuesday that a $1.76 million attorneys' fee request from Six Flags Theme Parks Inc. and other amusement park operators be denied as excessive, but said they should be able to recoup some costs after coming out on top in the "exceptional" patent case.

  4. February 07, 2014

    Six Flags, Disney Rides Don't Infringe Patent, Magistrate Says

    Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., The Walt Disney Co. and other theme park operators do not infringe a magnetic brake patent because the patent claims contain errors rendering them invalid, a federal magistrate judge said in a recommendation Friday. 

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!