MARCHESE v. CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

2:10-cv-02190

Court:

New Jersey

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Madeline Cox Arleo

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. December 11, 2015

    Cablevision Settles Long-Running Suit Over Box-Tying

    A putative class of Cablevision subscribers alleging the company used its market muscle to force them into renting its cable boxes asked a federal judge Friday to certify a settlement class and approve a months-long negotiated settlement obligating Cablevision to activate and support third-party boxes, among other requirements.

  2. July 01, 2015

    Cablevision Customers Push For Cert. In Cable Box-Tying Row

    A putative class of Cablevision cable subscribers pushed a New Jersey federal judge Tuesday to certify their class, saying the company's tying of set-top box rentals to cable subscriptions should sufficiently bind them as a group.

  3. January 11, 2012

    Judge Trims Monopoly Claim From Cablevision Tying Suit

    A New Jersey federal judge on Monday pared down a putative antitrust class action that accuses Cablevision Systems Corp. of illegally tying cable box rentals to other services, nixing a monopolization count but letting tying and unjust enrichment claims move forward.

  4. July 25, 2011

    Cablevision Gets Cable Box Tying Action Tossed

    A New Jersey federal judge on Thursday dismissed for the third time a putative class action accusing Cablevision Systems Corp. of illegally tying cable box rentals to other services, but gave the plaintiffs one more chance to amend their claims.