Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Case Number:
6:11-cv-00201
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Cole Schotz
- Cozen O'Connor
- Dentons
- Duane Morris
- Egan Enders
- Findlay Craft
- Finnegan
- Jackson Walker LLP
- Jeffer Mangels
- Kaufman Dolowich
- Latham & Watkins
- Mayer Brown
- Norton Rose
- Pachulski Stang
- Parsons McEntire
- Perkins Coie
- Wilson Sonsini
- Yarbrough Wilcox
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 05, 2018
Gilstrap Doubles $4M Jury Verdict In LCD Patent Row
U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on Monday ordered Chi Mei Innolux Corp. to pay competitor Eidos Display LLC more than $8 million for infringing a patent tied to LCD displays, doubling a jury's verdict as punishment for Innolux's repeated discovery misconduct and lack of investigation into the infringement claims.
-
June 30, 2017
Jury Awards Eidos $4.1M Verdict In LCD Patent Row
A Texas federal jury awarded Eidos Display LLC $4.1 million in damages Friday, agreeing that LCD panel maker Chi Mei Innolux Corporation had knowingly violated one of its patents that decreases the number of steps necessary in the screen-making process.
-
May 23, 2017
Screen Manufacturers Settle In Long-Running LCD Patent Suit
Eidos Display resolved its long-standing patent infringement dispute with another screen manufacturer, HannStar Display, over its use of technology meant to improve liquid crystal displays in Texas federal court Monday.
-
April 25, 2011
AUO, Chi Mei Slammed With LCD Patent Suit
AU Optronics Corp. and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA Inc. were hit with a suit in Texas on Monday by Eidos Display LLC alleging the companies infringed a patent for liquid crystal display technology.