We use cookies on this site to enable your digital experience. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our cookie policy. close

April 25, 2011

Eidos Display, LLC et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.


  1. March 5, 2018

    Gilstrap Doubles $4M Jury Verdict In LCD Patent Row

    U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on Monday ordered Chi Mei Innolux Corp. to pay competitor Eidos Display LLC more than $8 million for infringing a patent tied to LCD displays, doubling a jury’s verdict as punishment for Innolux’s repeated discovery misconduct and lack of investigation into the infringement claims.

3 other articles on this case. View all »


To view the parties, register now.