Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Osberg v. Foot Locker, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:07-cv-01358
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 15, 2011
Amara Ruling Can't Save Foot Locker ERISA Claim: Judge
A federal judge on Monday refused to revive a claim that Foot Locker Inc. failed to give a class of employees sufficient notice when it converted its pension plan into a "cash balance" plan, despite the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling in Cigna Corp. v. Amara.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →