Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Biro v. Conde Nast et al
Case Number:
1:11-cv-04442
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Ballard Spahr
- Cahill Gordon
- Giskan Solotaroff
- Herrick Feinstein
- Levine DeSantis
- Lyons McGovern
- Paul Weiss
- Pillsbury Winthrop
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 01, 2013
Conde Nast Beats Libel Suit Over New Yorker Article
A federal judge on Thursday threw out a libel suit a Canadian art expert brought against Conde Nast over a 2010 article in the New Yorker, ruling that the expert failed to meet the so-called actual malice standard.
-
May 17, 2013
Conde Nast Libel Suit Likely To Face Tough Road
A Canadian art expert who sued Conde Nast for defamation will likely be ruled a public figure, a federal judge said Friday, a decision that would make it more difficult for him to prove claims related to a 2010 New Yorker article.
-
February 13, 2013
Conde Nast Libel Suit May Hinge On 'Public Figure' Ruling
Conde Nast told a New York federal judge on Wednesday that discovery in Canadian forensic art expert Peter Paul Biro's defamation suit against The New Yorker should not proceed before deciding whether or not Biro is a public figure, saying a "public figure" designation would require Biro to prove that the magazine acted maliciously.
-
August 09, 2012
Judge Narrows Art Expert's Libel Case Against Conde Nast
A New York federal judge kept alive a Canadian forensic art expert's defamation suit against Conde Nast Publications over an article highlighting his work published in The New Yorker, but tossed claims that the article as a whole was defamatory.