July 20, 2016
An internet user suing defunct advertising software company Paxfire asked a New York federal judge Wednesday to toss the company's $80 million countersuit accusing her of defamation, saying she wasn't responsible for a leaked complaint used in a news article over her proposed class action.
July 14, 2016
A now-defunct online advertising software provider asked a New York federal judge for a quick win Thursday against an internet user alleging it redirected users to fake versions of search engines like Google and Bing then used those bogus sites to generate ad revenue.
February 03, 2016
An online advertising software company told a New York federal court on Tuesday that an Internet user should be liable for defamation because her former attorneys at Reese LLP and Milberg LLP leaked a draft copy of her proposed privacy class action against the company to a journalist.
December 21, 2015
A New York federal judge on Friday sent to a magistrate judge an advertising software company's bids for dismissal and for disqualification of the lead plaintiff as class representative in a heated dispute over the company's alleged interception of customers' Internet activity for profit, finding the disputes were within the judge's purview.
November 05, 2015
An Internet user pressing a proposed class action against an advertising software company asked a New York federal judge on Thursday to consider again making the company pay expenses of sorting duplicate files it gave her, saying the judge denied costs based on an erroneous assumption that she had previously deleted the documents.
June 26, 2015
Advertising software company Paxfire Inc. can depose the lead plaintiff's counsel in a proposed class action accusing it of intercepting customers' Internet activity for profit, a New York federal judge ruled Friday, saying the attorney was acting as a fact gatherer.
August 14, 2012
A California federal judge on Monday shut down deposition bids from advertising software company Paxfire Inc. in a putative class action accusing it and RCN Corp. of intercepting customers' Internet activity for profit, but preserved its demand for documents from researchers whose work uncovered the alleged scheme.