Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Supreme Auto Transport LLC v. Arcelor Mittal et al
Case Number:
1:08-cv-05468
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Baker & Hostetler
- Dechert LLP
- Eimer Stahl
- Gass Turek
- Katten Muchin
- Kirby McInerney
- Lovell Stewart
- Mayer Brown
- Neal Gerber
- Paul Weiss
- Reed Smith
- Seyfarth Shaw
- Sidley Austin
- Smith Gambrell
- Taft Stettinius
- Thompson Coburn
- TottisLaw
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
- AK Steel Holding Corp.
- ArcelorMittal
- Commercial Metals Co.
- Gerdau
- Steel Dynamics Inc.
- United States Steel Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 16, 2017
Steel Dynamics Settles 'Very Low'-Strength Antitrust Claims
Indirect steel purchasers alleging a price-fixing conspiracy among U.S. Steel, ArcelorMittal SA and other producers asked an Illinois federal court Tuesday to approve a nearly $1 million settlement with defendant Steel Dynamics, while acknowledging their case's strength is "very low" because the claims were recently tossed.
-
March 03, 2017
US Steel, Others Beat Indirect Buyers' Price-Fixing Suit
Major steel producers including U.S. Steel and ArcelorMittal SA escaped antitrust claims from indirect purchasers alleging a price-fixing conspiracy in Illinois federal court on Friday, just weeks after the court finalized a $30 million settlement between three other defendant companies and their direct purchasers.