Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Open Range Communications Inc.
Case Number:
1:11-bk-13188
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Ashby & Geddes
- Balch & Bingham
- Ballard Spahr
- Becket & Lee
- Brown & Connery
- Buchalter APC
- Chipman Brown
- Cole Schotz
- Connolly Gallagher
- Conway Olejniczak
- Emalfarb Swan
- Forman Holt
- Fox Rothschild
- Gellert Scali
- Gordon Fournaris
- Holland & Hart
- Latham & Watkins
- MacElree Harvey
- Margolis Edelstein
- McCarter & English
- McDermott Will & Emery
- McGrath North
- Mirick O'Connell
- Montgomery McCracken
- Morris James
- Norton Rose
- Pierce Atwood
- Polsinelli PC
- Richards Layton
- Saul Ewing
- SkarlatosZonarich
- Squire Patton
- Sullivan Hazeltine
- Swartz Campbell
- Wilk Auslander
Companies
- Alabama Power Co.
- Alianza
- Alvarion Ltd.
- American Tower Corp.
- Anton Collins Mitchell LLP
- Avaya Inc.
- Crown Castle Inc.
- G4S
- Heritage Global Inc.
- Nsight
- One Equity Partners LLC
- Open Range Communications Inc.
- Oracle Corp.
- SAP AG
- tw telecom inc.
- Universal Service Administrative Co.
- Velocitel LLC
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 18, 2012
Open Range Inks Deal With Lender To Wind Down Ch. 7
Open Range Communications Inc.'s Chapter 7 trustee minted a settlement Tuesday that resolves a $6 million claim from the private equity investor that bankrolled its failed reorganization, removing the last obstacle holding up the defunct broadband company's liquidation.
-
November 21, 2012
Open Range Settles With US Over Axed $267M Stimulus Loan
The Chapter 7 trustee for Open Range Communications Inc. on Wednesday settled his adversary suit in Delaware bankruptcy court claiming the U.S. government toppled the rural broadband company into bankruptcy when it cut off funding for a $267 million loan.
-
August 16, 2012
Open Range Trustee Targets Feds Over $267M Stimulus Loan
The Chapter 7 trustee for Open Range Communications Inc. is suing several federal agencies, claiming the government toppled the rural broadband company into bankruptcy when it cut off funding for a $267 million loan, according to a complaint unsealed Thursday.
-
May 23, 2012
Open Range Trustee Seeks Damages From PE Lender
The Chapter 7 trustee for Open Range Communications Inc. launched an adversary suit in Delaware bankruptcy court Tuesday against One Equity Partners III LP, claiming the investment firm withheld $16.5 million in funding it had promised the now-defunct Internet provider.
-
February 07, 2012
With No Deal Over $267M US Loan, Open Range Seeks Ch. 7
Open Range Communications Inc. asked a Delaware court on Monday to convert its Chapter 11 case to Chapter 7, saying it was unlikely to have a reorganization plan resolving the Internet provider's potential claims against the U.S. Department of Agriculture over a $267 million loan.
-
January 30, 2012
US Objects To Open Range Creditors' Demands
The U.S. told a Delaware bankruptcy judge Friday it should not have to produce documents and witnesses requested by Open Range Communication Inc.'s unsecured creditors, arguing that the quick, informal and cooperative investigation it agreed to risks becoming a formal, open-ended and adversarial one.
-
January 18, 2012
Open Range Creditors Press To Get Docs From Agencies
The unsecured creditors committee for Open Range Communications Inc. asked a Delaware bankruptcy judge on Tuesday to force various federal agencies to hand over documents, as the committee gears up to sue the government on the rural Internet provider's behalf.
-
January 13, 2012
Open Range Creditors Get Extension Over US Objection
Unsecured creditors in Open Range Communications Inc.'s Delaware bankruptcy case won a hotly contested motion Friday to extend the time in which they can investigate and sue federal agencies on the Internet provider's behalf, a move the government had called unnecessary and burdensome.
-
January 10, 2012
US Slams Open Range Creditors' Extension Bid
The U.S. on Tuesday asked the Delaware judge overseeing Open Range Communications Inc.'s bankruptcy case to deny a bid by unsecured creditors to extend the time in which they can investigate and sue government agencies on the Internet provider's behalf, saying an extension would be unnecessary and burdensome.